« February 2008 | Main | April 2008 »

March 2008

SWEET 16 SCENE

Left in the aftermath of the first two rounds of this year's NCAA Tournament we find 16 teams moving onto the the 3rd round of this year's big event. Upsets galore, for sure. The question remains, though, will many other upset likely occur between now and the crowning of a new champion on April 7th.

Let's take a look at how the teams have fared in arriving to the SWEET 16 round of this tourney. Listed below are the teams and the total points scored and allowed, in addition to their ATS mark within the tournament:

Washington State 132-81 (2-0)
North Carolina 221-151 (2-0)

Louisville 157-109n (2-0)
Tennessee 148-128 (1-1)

West Virginia 148-132 (2-0)
Xavier 158-139 (2-0)

Western Kentucky 173-162 (2-0)
Ucla 121-73 (1-1)

Villanova 159-141 (2-0)
Kansas 160-117 (2-0)

Davidson 156-142 (2-0)
Wisconsin 143-111 (2-0)

Michigan State 137-118 (2-0)
Memphis 164-137 (0-2)

Stanford 159-134 (1-1)
Texas 149-126 (1-1)

Notice, if you will, that the teams that have arrived to this round are 26-6 ATS combined, with Memphis the only team having yet to cash a ticket.

One final thought. Look for teams with better defenses to begin to assert themselves from this point forward as these teams tend to find their way to the Final Four. Good luck.

NCAA Tournament - East Bracket Preview

NCAA Tournament
EAST Bracket Preview

For 65 Division 1-A teams the road to San Antonio starts somewhere in a city near you.  The three-week trek in front promises to be filled with accidents (read: upsets) aplenty.

To help guide you through the exciting journey ahead, here is our take on the sixteen teams based in the East Bracket.  Ladies and gentlemen, it’s time to buckle up and start your brackets.

North Carolina (1) vs. Play-In Winner (16)
We all know the story by now that a No. 16 seed has never beat a top seed in this event.   Did you know, however, that No. 1 seeds win an average 3.36 games per event in this tourney since 1985.   It’s hard to fade the top scoring margin, and best rebounding team in the land, especially with one team (Coppin State) that was 0-4 against fellow tourney teams this season by an average loss of 36.5 pgg, while the other (Mount St. Mary’s) was 1-3 against the same.  Still, with the Tar Heels just 1-4-1 ATS as a favorite of more than 20 points in the tourney, it’s probably best to observe the top seed for a while.

Indiana (8) vs. Arkansas (9)
Past results from this particular conference pairing has been favorable for the Big 10, as they are 11-5 SU and ATS against the SEC in the Big Dance since 1999.  Indiana, though, has not adapted under interim coach Dan Dakich, as they are just 3-3 SU and 1-5 ATS since he took over from Kelvin Sampson a month ago. Red-faced Arkansas dropped a tailor-made championship against Georgia but five returning starters should help them advance out of the first round. And for what it’s worth, should the Razorbacks manage to defeat Indiana, No. 9 seeds are a pathetic 3-47 straight-up in Round Two since 1985 when taking on a higher seeded opponent. Gulp.

Notre Dame (5) vs. George Mason (12)
This is slot of the dreaded No. 12 over the No. 5 seed theory (last year was only the 2nd time since 1988 that a 12 failed to beat a 5). Notre Dame went 24-7 this year, however, the Irish were only 7-7 away from South Bend this season.  The Irish were bounced in the first round of this tourney in rather embarrassing fashion by Winthrop last season.  They’ll need to bring their ‘A” game against the Pirates, a Cinderella team in this event two years ago.  The Mason Jar is 4-2 SU and 5-1 ATS in the Big Dance this decade. 

Washington State  (4) vs. Winthrop (13)
Make no mistake, the Eagles of Winthrop can play.  They knocked off Notre Dame in the first round of this tournament last year and beat top-seeded UNC Ashville by 18-points in the Big South title game to earn this bid.  A win at Miami Florida this season further confirms that notion.  Wazzu brings solid credentials of its own, too.  A guard–oriented unit, Tony Bennett’s troops turned back tourney rivals Oregon and USC two times each while also handing Gonzaga its only home loss of the season this year. Still, asking a low scoring team (67 ppg) to win a game of this magnitude by double-digits is not our cup of tea. Take it or leave it.

Oklahoma (6) vs. St. Joseph’s (11)
Oklahoma did well to gain a No. 6 seed after finishing up 10-8 SU and 6-12 ATS in conference play this season.  The Sooners are just 3-9 ATS in NCAA openers, including 1-6 SU and ATS when facing a .612 or greater opponent.  They were also only 5-9 ATS against fellow tournament teams this season.  St. Joe’s utilized a 3-1 SU and ATS record in the A-10 tourney to gain a big into the Big Dance. Phil Martelli’s troops were 9-2 ATS outside the conference this season and are 9-2 SU in NCAA openers.  Before flying off with the Hawks, though, you need to know No. 6 seeds are 14-1- SU and 13-1-1 ATS vs .636 or less opposition.

Louisville (3) vs. Boise State (14)
Lucky No. 3 seed for the Cardinals as 18 of the last 21 NCAA champs have been No. 1, 2 or 3 seeded teams.  Louisville held their owns against other tourney teams this season, going 9-5 SU and ATS.  Also have to admire Rick Pitino’s 32-10 record in this tourney.  Behind the nation’s 7th best field goal defense, the Cards look to be a live sleeper.  Boise State was a ‘double champion’ (won regular and conference tourney titles), making them a consideration play in Game One.  The Broncos were 14-3 SU and 11-3-1 ATS away from home this season and suffered only three losses by more than 12 points. Interestingly, they are the 4th best shooting team in the land (50.2%).

Butler (7) vs. South Alabama (10)
The Bulldogs performed extremely well outside the Horizon Conference this season as their 11-1 SU and 9-2 ATS record attests. They have also rewarded their backers in the first game of this tournament, going 4-10 ATS. The scales mean a lot in this paring as No. 7 seeds are 22-10-1 ATS if they own a win percentage of .680 or greater. However, can’t look past the Jaguars 5-0 ATS mark this season against other tournament teams.  Unfortunately, they are an NCAA tourney virgin at 0-2 SU and ATS.

Tennessee (2) vs. American (15)
The Vols lead the pack for a lap after handing Memphis their only defeat of the season a month ago. They are the 2nd best team in this tourney in steals (9.5) and offensive rebounds (14.8) per game.  They are also the 4th best tourney team in assists per game (18.1), so they do have credentials. Meanwhile the Patriots are another ‘double champion’ and enter the tournament with 11 wins in their last 12 games. American allowed less than 66 ppg along the way. Lest we forget, Tennessee was 21-1 SU and 12-4-2 ATS this season in games in which they scored 80-plus points and 8-3 SU and 2-9 ATS in games in which they didn’t.

Be sure to download a copy of the 2008 PLAYBOOK NCAA Tournament Guide Newsletter.  It's a must-read if you're serious about winning throughout March Madness!




   

BIG EAST TOURNEY PREVIEW

With the College Conference Tourneys now underway, let's take a sneak peek at the BIG EAST TOURNAMENT.  Note: this excerpt is from this week's PLAYBOOK Basketball Newsletter, which features in-depth writeups and analysis on all 17 Conference Tourneys.  You can download copy from the PLAYBOOK Store.  Enjoy...

BIG EAST CONFERENCE
March 12 - 15 (All games at Madison Square Garden • New York City, NY)

PLAYBOOK PROJECTED FINAL FOUR
GEORGETOWN – LOUISVILLE – CONNECTICUT – NOTRE DAME

The way we see it: The common denominator of the top three teams in this tourney is the fact that they all reside in the Top 10 in Defensive Field Goal Percentage. GEORGETOWN is the nation’s leading stop unit (36.2%).  The Hoyas are 16-1 SU in lid lifters and not all that much thereafter.  However, should they puppy-up we’ll be on them like white-on-rice. LOUISVILLE is the No. 3 team in the land is DFG% at 37.9.  Their conference tourney history is weak (see below) but, heading into Saturday’s fray at G-Town, they were 9-4 SU and ATS away from home this season.  Like the Hoyas, the Cardinals should prove dangerous if they find themselves taking points.  CONNECTICUT is a proven post-season commodity (49-16 SU since 1996) but only mediocre in this extravaganza.  He Huskies rank No. 8 in DFG% at 38.5 and should be considered in any underdog role.  NOTRE DAME doesn’t bring the defensive intensity that the three aforementioned clubs do, but they clean the glass with proficiency, ranking No. 20 in Rebound Margin at +5.9 net RPG.  The problem is they don’t have much history to speak of in this tourney (4-12 SU and ATS) and they were 0-3 SU and ATS against .850 or better opposition this season.

THE SLEEPER: MARQUETTE
Golden Eagles bring five returning starters to the Garden, making them extremely dangerous in any matchup.  After going just 1-10-1 ATS in it their previous twelve conference tourney games, they have cashed two of their last three the past two seasons in this event.  Don’t discount their chances this year.

KEY TOURNAMENT BEST BET: PLAY ON MARQUETTE versus Louisville.  As outline above the Eagles bring a lot to the table, including an 8-3 ATS mark in games away from home this season.  They’ll take on the Cardinals with double revenge from losses this year knowing Louisville is just 5-11 ATS the last 16 games in this tourney.  The points are a bonus in this matchup.